Free message and fuck usa no credit cards
Businesses owners, not politicians, should decide what forms of payment they'll accept, and consumers who prefer to pay in cash can take their business elsewhere.The market is pretty good at these kinds of transactions, especially since private establishments have to compete to stay in business. I talk with people who hear about where I’m going, and they always say the same thing: “That sounds amazing!I wish I could do that.” My reply is always the same: “What’s keeping you from it?It's also worth noting that cash-free establishments tend to be on the pricier side.Is going cash-free, then, a form of price discrimination?
We choose what we value, either consciously or unconsciously.
Non-cash forms of payment are getting faster by the day, meaning cash-free establishments can offer faster service.
Plus, consumers can more easily keep track of what they're spending.
Torres told he sees cash-free policies as "racially exclusionary in practice." According to a 2015 study from the Urban Institute, 11.7 percent of New York households had no bank accounts.
The survey did not break down its results by race, though a national survey released last month by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) did: Roughly 6.5 percent of American households were unbanked last year, the FDIC said, including 16.9 percent of black households and 14 percent of Hispanic households.
For one thing, there's a lot of time, effort, and money that goes into accepting and processing cash. Many companies launch with cash-free payment models to protect their employees; the absence of cash transactions has long been cited as a safeguard for Uber drivers, for instance.